Ed Miliband at the Muslim News Awards
The chief guest at The Muslim News’ annual awards for excellence on 25th March was the Leader of the Opposition, Rt Hon Ed Miliband MP. His address was sincere and direct, referring too to his own experiences as a first-generation Briton – his parents were Polish Jewish immigrants seeking a new, secure life in Britain during World War II. In contrast to the ‘us’ and ‘them’ rhetoric of Tory and UKIP politicians in which being Muslims are lectured about ‘British values’ – a term he did not use – Miliband referred to the Muslim contribution in World War I. He also noted,’the Muslim community is central to our history and a cornerstone to our country’s future’. Ed’s speech was short on specific commitments, perhaps because the Labour Party’s BME manifesto is still awaited, but he did indicate that a Labour government would initiate programmes to tackle Islamophobia in schools. Something to hold him to after May 7?
Is time running out for Lord Greville Janner?
Respected political leaders of the not-so-recent past are now being exposed for their low life. For the first time, a broadsheet has linked Lord Janner with the current spotlight on Parliamentarians and a rent boy circle of the 1960s and 70s (The Times, 18 March 2015). For example Leon Brittan, son of Joseph and Rebecca Brittan, Tory MP from 1974 to 1988 who held high office in Cabinet (Home Secretary, Secretary for Trade and Industry) before taking over a top portfolio in at the European Commission (1989-1999) has had his various homes recently searched by the Met in connection with its child sex abuse investigation, though their suspect had passed away some months earlier. Various dossiers ‘helpful to enquiries’ possibly kept by Brittan during his stint at the Home Office have been difficult to locate. There was speculation that this was to protect powerful MPs and Peers. Now The Times notes: ‘the police watchdog has ordered Leicestershire police to examine claims of a cover-up involving Greville Jenner, then a Labour MP and now a peer’. Jenner came to wider public attention in 1996, when Home Secretary Michael Howard wrote to him, in his capacity as an office-bearer at the Board of Deputies, as follows:
Thank you for your letter of 5 March.
I am happy to confirm that the Government is determined that this country should not be used as a base for promoting terrorism overseas in any way…In answer to your specific question, there is full co-operation on counter-terrorism between our services and those of Israel…I can assure you that any credible information or intelligence about terrorist activity is investigated. In the case of Hamas, the police and Security Services have seen no proof to support allegations that funds raised by Hamas in the UK are used directly in support of terrorist acts anywhere. Nor have we received any evidence to prove that Hamas members have planned or ordered terrorist operations from the UK. We have asked, and are asking, the Israeli authorities to provide us with any new information they may have. I need hardly add that the vast majority of the Muslim community in the UK are entirely law-abiding.
Where sufficient evidence emerges that individuals are involved in terrorism of any kind, we do not not hesitate to take action against them…I am satisfied that there is no need for a further enquiry into these matters. As I told you on Monday, I am very happy to give these assurances wider currency; I am therefore releasing copies of this letter as you did yours.”
Oh for a good editor!
The OIC, a coordinating organisation of 57 Muslim nation-states with its HQ in Jeddah and a former Saudi information minister, Iyad Madani, as Secretary General, is not short of a bob or two. A recent issue of its house journal has an article by a Talal Al-Daous, a departmental director dealing with Muslim minorities and also adviser to the SG. This contribution, entitled ‘Analysing political decision-makers behaviours’ reflects not just sloppy grammar, but atrocious spelling – note the inability to distinguish between ‘weather’ and ‘whether':
However setting aside these quibbles, other articles do offer some revealing statistics: that the OIC member states’ share of global scientific production in 2013 was 6.1%! Another contribution notes that of the top 400 universities in the world, there are only 18 from OIC member countries – and there is also a 40% illiteracy rate. The OIC may need a sharper-eyed editor but the Muslim world is short of massive Bill Gates-type educational endowments. click here.
Deep state and revolving doors
Perhaps too-little noticed has been the account by the distinguished Guardian columnist, Seamas Milne, on the circumstances that led to Alasdair Milne’s dramatic departure from the BBC in 1986 – it is a tale that reflect’s on Britain’s own ‘deep state':
By the time the BBC’s offices in Glasgow were raided by Special Branch over a film that was never broadcast about a secret British intelligence satellite that was never launched, preparations to sack the director general were far advanced. Such a thing had never happened before. It was a transparently political operation, and was intended to be so. In the autumn of 1986, Thatcher installed Marmaduke Hussey as BBC chairman, a man with impeccable Conservative connections and a fiercely anti-union record. She did so, Seaton reveals [in her book Pinkoes and Traitors], only after first seeking the approval of Murdoch, the BBC’s “most committed commercial and political enemy”. Hussey then consulted Victor Rothschild, a security adviser to Thatcher (and one-time associate of the Cambridge spies). According to Hussey’s memoirs, it was Rothschild who proposed firing the director general. That was finalised over lunch with the home secretary, Douglas Hurd. Within three months, it was done. No explanation was given. And Hussey used a threat to my father’s pension to persuade him to resign for “personal reasons” – and prevent him speaking out in public. click here.
Seamas Milne also reveals the bias in Seaton’s account, illustrating the revolving doors at the heart of the deep state: “The book is littered with inaccuracies and demonstrable distortions: from names and dates to the self-serving spin of those who have survived to tell the tale. In the case of the Thatcher-inspired sacking of the director general, Seaton claims he had been “misleading the governors” over the Maggie’s Militant Tendency libel action and that they had “intended” to sack this “zombie DG” for three years. There is no evidence for either claim. The libel case only started to unravel when Tory pressure led witnesses to withdraw their testimony. And as one surviving governor of the time confirms, dismissal had not been discussed even informally until the last few months. If they had even a half-baked case of professional incompetence to justify decapitation, they would have certainly used it – and they did not. Tellingly, the source of these claims turns out to be Patricia Hodgson, then the BBC company secretary and a long-time Conservative confidante of Thatcher. Three decades later, she is chair of Ofcom, the government’s neoliberal broadcasting and communications regulator whose central purpose is the promotion of “free market” competition. It naturally suits Hodgson to try to depoliticise a destructive assault on the BBC in which she was intimately involved.”
Sara Khan – declare your interests!
The good lady Sara Khan has built a reputation as a severe critic of anything the MCB does, sometimes going overboard in her scorn. Most recently this was in the Guardian’s interview (30 January 2015) with Dr Shuja Shafi, when madam was most obliging in pooh-poohing his organisation’s work: ‘They [the MCB] seem to be very vocal about extremism, condemning the Prevent strategy, but I’ve never seen them really lead on grassroots counter-extremism projects’.
What does ‘really leading’ mean, as opposed to just ‘leading’?
She was similarly hostile during the Trojan Horse saga. In July 2014, the MCB issued this statement on the Trojan Horse saga:
…The evidence Mr Clarke cites, for example of social media conversations exhibiting inappropriate behaviour are indeed very disturbing and may constitute grounds for disciplinary, procedural and legal action. However, we do take issue with Mr Clarke’s approach that chooses to ascribe guilt by association, and by conflating conservative Muslim practises to a supposed ideology and agenda to ‘Islamise’ secular schools….For the avoidance of any doubt, the MCB call for an inclusive education, and we call for fairness, not favours. We do not call for a curriculum that promotes segregation, or an outlook on life that does not accept the pluralism that exists in Britain today. click here for rest of MCB statement.
But Sara Khan’s take was this: “… they [the MCB] complained that Mr Clarke was “conflating conservative Muslim practices to a supposed ideology and agenda to ‘Islamise’ secular schools.” For the record, I’d like to know: what exactly does the MCB define as conservative Muslim practice? Does the MCB believe homophobia, sexism, intolerance and the “inferiority” of other faiths are conservative Muslim practices?”
Why this over-the-top criticism? Is it juvenile establishment-bashing or something else?
Well, it is time for the boot to be in the other foot. From now on, it is only right that when called up by the media to criticise Muslim civil society for ‘not doing enough about extremism/homophobia/sexism/intolerance etc. etc’, there ought to be this declaration of interests – “I have been a Government consultant”. This is because she co-founded Inspire, a body that has been in receipt of Prevent-related funding via work for councils.
Source: The Taxpayers Alliance (2009)
The MCB is not above criticism and neither is Sara Khan. She should declare the financial benefits obtained from HMG’s largesse – the above work in Redbridge may only be a fraction of fees. And does the conflict of interests end there? What about her sister Sabin Khan’s association with the Home Office? Though it must be said, to give Sabin credit, she seems a person of mettle having confronted Theresa May. When such declarations of interest are forthcoming from Sara Khan, we can decide whether madam is a fair and credible commentator on British Muslim matters.
Goalkeepers needed, not Gatekeepers
The Baroness has a particular problem with the Muslim Council of Britain, which surfaces in her recent article in the Observer (24 January 2015): ‘my criticism, which I have on numerous occasions discussed with it, is that it continues to produce a leadership that is neither equipped to represent, nor is genuinely reflective of, the contemporary aspirations of large sections of British Muslim communities’.
Who is to be the objective judge whether an umbrella body is ‘genuinely’ representative of aspirations of large sections’ of British Muslims? It has required considerable struggle and effort to establish the MCB, which though not perfect, is the best thing the community has at present to a responsible, constitutionally-governed, non-sectarian, representative body, running since 1997. It has benefited from the coalition-building skills of community leaders such as Sir Iqbal Sacranie and Dr Abul Bari, the organisational expertise of Dr Akbar Mohamedali and Mrs Unaiza Malik and eminent professionals like Judge Khurshid Drabu and Khalid Sofi who advise on transparency and governance. Its annual general meetings are demanding and lively, and delegates of affiliates hold the leadership to account in no uncertain terms. Today, its deputy secretary general, Harun Khan, represents a British-born generation of talented Muslims willing to give community service. The Baroness has never discussed ways of strengthening and building on this work; the criticism, which she states was offered on ‘numerous occasions’, has more often been along the lines, ‘the MCB needs to grow up’!
Sayeeda Warsi would like an alternative to the MCB: a Muslim Leadership Council, styled on the Jewish Leadership Council. Her Observer article notes, ‘She [Warsi] voices her frustration at the refusal by the coalition to establish a Muslim equivalent of the Jewish Leadership Council (JLC) which arranges for community figures to share their views directly with the prime minister’. The JLC, launched in 2009, seems to be a mix comprising heads of large Jewish charitable and community service bodies but the key players are individuals (such as mining mogul Mick Davis and other tycoons including Ronald Cohen and Poju Zabludowicz). Warsi would seek to create yet another body, thus asking British Muslims to put aside the MCB and start afresh. The more important lesson to be learned from British Jewry is not the JLC, but the fact that it was able to sustain one representative organisation, the Board of Deputies, for almost 250 years.
Warsi places premium on a forum that would enable ‘community figures’ to share their views ‘directly with the prime minister’. However, if these community figures are to comprise a JLC-type make-up, representing business and politically-partisan interests, what are the safeguards that commitments will not be made on behalf of British Muslims in an arbitrary way? There will always be an inclination in Downing Street to call the shots and expect compliance. This was very much Blair’s style – when some Muslim leaders were called to Downing Street on 27 September 2001 on the eve of the bombing of Afghanistan, Alastair Cambell told them, ‘you guys have a selling job to do’.
The Baroness may think her destiny is to to work for a voice for British Muslims in the corridors of power. Hats off to her for that vision, but there is a way of approaching it in a wise, humble and principled manner – by strengthening existing Muslim civil society institutions.
Baroness Sayeeda Warsi is no doubt a star in British life who can act on principle. Her response to the letter sent by the Secretary of State for Commmunities and Local Government (CLG) to mosque imams contained much good sense. She resigned as foreign office minister in the Coalition Government in August 2014, because the policy on Gaza was ‘morally indefensible’. In 2011, she memorably remarked, ‘Islamophobia has now passed the dinner-table-test’, the first senior politician to acknowledge this noxious canker in British life. A year earlier, she had called for society that pursued ‘equality and opportunity’, adding ‘let us be sure that in our time British Muslims aren’t entitled to the crumbs from the table but to a stake in the cake’. While a minister at CLG she was instrumental in releasing funds for the ‘Remembering Srebrenica’ campaign, now energetically led by her advisor Dr Waqar Azami. It is a welcome sign that the recent delegation to Bosnia included MCB representatives. Hopefully we are all growing up. The need of the hour is not for gatekeepers to Downing Street, but rather good teamwork with good goalkeepers to defend and strengthen existing Muslim civil society.
Over and out!
This is what Kathrin Oertel, a leader of the German Islamophobe movement Pegida said in January: ‘ … in Germany we have political repression again. Or how would you see it when we are insulted or called racists or Nazis openly by all the political mainstream parties and media….
Well, the link with the Nazis is now apparent: ‘The head of the German anti-Islamisation movement Pegida has stepped down after a picture of him posing as Adolf Hitler went viral… the picture of Bachmann [co-founder of Pegida] posing as Hitler after a session at his hairdresser, complete with a Hitler hairstyle dyed black and parted on the right and a toothbrush moustache, went viral on Wednesday after it was published by a local newspaper, the Dresden Morgenpost.’ click here.
Finally, patience runs out
– Dr Muhammad Abdul Bari, former Secretary General of the Muslim Council of Britain and former Chair of Trustees of the East London Mosque Trust Fund is a courteous and mild-mannered gentleman to the bone. He has long suffered the tendentious insinuations of journalist Andrew Gilligan on the dark, illiberal forces within Muslim civil society. This journalist can hardly write a sentence about the MCB, the Islamic Foundation, the East London Mosque or Islamic Forum Europe without adjectives such as ‘entryist’, ‘radical’ or ‘hardline’. For example, an article in the Daily Telegraph in February 2010, there was the ridiculous assertion, ‘The Islamic Forum of Europe (IFE) which believes in jihad and sharia law, [and] wants to turn Britain and Europe into an Islamic state…’. . Gilligan was strident at the outset of the ‘Trojan Horse’ saga in March-April 2014, resurrecting an MCB report written 7 years earlier co-authored by Dr Bari, describing it in lurid terms as a ‘detailed blueprint for the radical ‘Islamisation’ of secular state schools’.
It seems that Dr Bari has had enough and it is now time to take off the gloves. Writing in Huffington Post after the Paris atrocity, he observes,
‘Sadly, some on the political Right are not helping by shabbily attacking Muslim individuals in this country for all sorts of issues. There is also a flagrant demand that all individual Muslims take responsibility for the criminal acts of others. When all across Europe are worried about the fallout from the Paris killings this can only be music to the ears of Islamophobic hate mongers.One such columnist, who is known for his destructive obsession with the Muslim community, has once again made a broadside against some Muslims, in an article Paris attacks: Why this could happen in Britain (The Telegraph) …Andrew Gilligan, the Telegraph journalist, targeted two Muslim individuals from around 100 others in the audience for his diatribe. Mr Gilligan’s tirade against many Muslim leaders is not new. Since a Dispatches film he made for Channel 4 in 2010 (‘Britain’s Islamic Republic’), done with shoddy research, he has been using his own brand of regurgitation to ‘prove’ how certain British Muslim individuals and organisations are working to create an ‘Islamic Republic’ in Britain (as if working in the public domain is a no-go area for Muslims)
Well said! For Dr Bari’s complete article, ‘Stoking Fear leads of Britain’s “Islamic Republic” leads to growing intolerance towards Muslims’, click here.
Where are the condemnations now?
The Church Fathers are quick to call on Muslims (even British Muslims far removed from happenings) to condemn violence. Often noticeable in this lineup is the former Bishop of Rochester, Michael Nazir-Ali, now President of the Oxford Centre for Training, Research, Advocacy and Dialogue, quick to take the high moral ground and discomfit Muslims. He recently called for the need to ‘stem the tide of Islamic militancy’ and even calling on the Pope – not a particularly loyal act for an Anglican – to ‘speak on behalf of persecuted Christians worldwide’. We now await his response to the tragedy unfolding in the Central African Republic: Tens of thousands of Muslims are fleeing to neighboring countries by plane and truck as Christian militias stage brutal attacks, shattering the social fabric of this war-ravaged nation. [Washington Post]. For that matter, what have British evangelical movement’s leaders said about the vicious Lord’s Resistance Army, which aims to rule Uganda according to the 10 commandments?
A Tale of two Cordobas
There is the Cordoba Foundation (TCF) in London, ‘a prominent UK based think tank, with an established and significant track record in conflict resolution, hostage negotiation, and the promotion of dialogue over the last decade.’ Then there is the Cordoba Institute (TCI) in New York, aiming to elevate ‘ the discourse in America on Muslims and presenting a pluralist, tolerant and compassionate vision of Islam’.
Prima facie, the expectation would be of converging points of view, mutual sympathy and unanimity of purpose. But when London’s TCF (CEO Anas Altikriti) was outrageously and irresponsibly labelled a ‘terrorist’ body by the United Arab Emirates (UAE) Federal Law No. 7 of November 2014, what did TCI’s head, Faisal Raof have to say?
No words of support for a fellow NGO – but rather this self-protective statement: ‘the similarity in the names of both organizations—or any others bearing the Cordoba name—is purely coincidental. TCI has no position on the UAE Cabinet’s designations.’
So Dr Raof has ‘no position’ to take when a Muslim civil society body is criminalised without any evidence! Presumably Dr Raof, in his concern for his standing as a patriotic and loyal American, will only come off the fence once the US ambassador in London gives Anas Altikriti an approval kite mark!
It brings to mind Mehmood Memdani’s observation in his essay ‘Good Muslim, Bad Muslim‘
.. we are now told to distinguish between good Muslims and bad Muslims. Mind you, not between good and bad persons, nor between criminals and civic citizens, who both happen to be Muslims, but between good Muslims and bad Muslims. We are told that there is a fault line running through Islam, a line that separates moderate Islam, called ‘genuine’ Islam, from extremist political Islam.
Oh for a Foreign Secretary with mettle!
The Secretary of State at the Foreign & Commonwealth Office is the Rt Hon Philip Hammond – someone with an astute business sense evident in the fortune he has made the care home business. However the need of the hour is for the Foreign Secretary to show some mettle. HMG needs to robust firmly to the UAE and Saudi demands to proscribe dissenting Muslim social and political activists in Britain – an interference in sovereignty to say the least. The latest demands are now to curtail the London-based Cordoba Foundation. Its founder and CEO Anas Altikriti has provided a firm riposte on the 5Pillarz website, in reference to the UAE:
…A regime that made no bones about its instrumental role in supporting the military coup that brought Egypt’s brief encounter with democracy to an end last year, bloodied its hands with a high profile assassination in Tunisia with the hope of creating a popular uprising against the then government led by the Islamist Ennahda party, and several attempts to poison the already chaotic scene in Libya by backing a rogue General from the pre-revolution era to launch air strikes via Egyptian fighters; the UAE is definitely going all out to crush not only its own reformist movement but virtually every reformist pro-democracy movement going throughout the region.
Hence, the absurd list. If The Cordoba Foundation is anything to go by, then it certainly sits on the wrong side of the UAE regime when it comes to supporting radical changes and reforms in a region seen as arguably the most oppressive and tyrannical, with records considered among the worst in the world on human rights and freedoms. And for that we make no apology. Indeed, if that’s the price that needs to be paid to support the transition of the entire region into the light of dignity and freedom, then so be it.
Mr Hammond should take a stand and say ‘hands off’ our civil society! National dignity should come before defence deals and promises of investment in nuclear power stations.
Truly hit for a six!
Pakistan beat Australia by 356 runs in the second and final Test.
Now that is a sporting headline to savour! Pakistan’s cricketing victory on 3rd November against Australia means that it has also won the series. An apt lesson for a cocky nation where racist remarks are commonplace and have emerged on the cricket pitch as well – those with long memories will remember the Dennis Lillee – Javed Miandad bust up, and more recently David Ritchie’s mocking remarks about petty thieves. A nice appreciation from Peter Oborne and Richard Heller in the Telegraph.
Ayad Madani and al-Sisi
Egypt today is facing repression: ‘In a presidential decree, President Abdel Fatah al-Sisi has rendered all public property – including power stations, universities, roads and bridges – as “equivalent to military facilities”. The decree means that any defendant accused of committing a crime on public property could be tried in a military court, a judicial system that Amnesty International says lacks due process and “cannot be seen as impartial and independent” (Patrick Kingsley in the Guardian, 28 October 2014)’. It is therefore ironical that the OIC feels fit to run such news items (taken from the latest OIC journal) referring to the visit of its Secretary General Ayad Ameen Madani:
So Sisi’s Egypt has a ‘pivotal role in advancing joint Islamic action in all (sic) spheres’!
An evening with the Radicals
It is not often that community organisers and activists, for ever reacting to one or other crisis, have an opportunity to raise their level of political literacy and even think long-term.
The book launch of S.Sayyid’s Recalling the Caliphate, Decolonisation and the World Order was a welcome opportunity for such an audience at the Muslim Council of Britain’s Whitechapel offices. Not only was the author at hand, but the event was compeered by AbdoolKarim Vakil, an equally talented and engaging thinker with the knack of summarising intellectual arguments to convey the kernel. If ‘Bobby’ Sayyid is the Islamicate Pankaj Mishra, then AKV is its Melvyn Bragg.
Much of the discussion was about the meaning and purpose of politics, and some of the problems that have stopped Muslims from ‘developing a vocabulary to talk about politics’. This is because of both internal limitations and external impositions. For S. Sayyid, the trend towards literalism (drawing a straight line from the text to events) has ‘stopped us thinking strategically and politically’; in this literalist and legalist mind-set, things are either good or bad; what we need are ‘resources to deal with the grey’, and to ‘stop reading our past canonically, but as history’. For him, the Caliphate was not a set of clearly laid out arrangements but a metaphor of how Muslims see the world. The Western hegemonic forces have left no room for debate, and Muslims now need to open up the space: ‘Muslims should be able to write their own history, how they want the future to be, to have the conversation’. One of Bobby Sayyid’s remarks left Salaam blogger’s mind buzzing: ‘Muslims should stop thinking of Islam as a religion – a notion permeated by the Western conception of Christianity – but more as a language; a language through which Muslims talk about themselves’.
The concept of ummah – the idea of multitude, ‘the commonality of similarities’ – means that Islam is an alternative globalisation. Muslims share a family resemblance, a comportment. There was a time when a scholar could travel from Djibouti to Djakarta and pray in the mosques along the route without difficulty. Muslims today ‘are too strong to be ignored, and to weak to change the rules of the game’. The War on Terror has become a sign of weakness of Western hegemony, because ‘violence is a sign of weakness’ and deployed ‘when an order is being created, or when an order is falling apart’. He called on the audience of community organisers to release themselves ‘from the grammar of the war on terror’ and become concerned with expressing Muslim agency. The fact that Muslims have played a prominent role in the anti-war marches and causes such as justice for Palestinians highlights their potential as a voice of conscience. A veteran community activist responded to this last observation by sharing an advice he had received from one of his ustads: that Muslims in Britain have a choice – either to live as sheep or lions; but they should remember the fate of sheep is usually the abattoir. Click here for details of S.Sayyid’s Recalling the Caliphate, Decolonisation and the World Order
Failing the litmus test?
A few weeks ago, the Secretary of State for Education Nicky Morgan put forward a proposal that GCSE religious studies students should learn about two faiths – this would mean making it mandatory, say on an Islamic faith school, to teach Christianity. According to the Daily Mail, the proposal was a response from our Government to the Trojan Horse saga: To ‘stop Islamic extremists from brainwashing children’!
Muslim schools would scarcely object to teaching another faith, particularly another Abrahamic religion. But note who was incensed: ‘…the Chief Rabbi’s office were said to have been “particularly heated in their anger” in their private responses to Mrs Morgan…This proposal will cause immense difficulties, particularly for Orthodox Jewish schools’ (reported in the Jewish Chronicle, 23 September 2014). What was that about shared values?
A London council has removed ‘unacceptable’ posters instructing women which side of the road they should walk down. The signs, which have ‘Women should please walk along this side of the road only’ written in both Yiddish and English, were spotted along Stamford Hill in Hackney. The Shomrim group, whose Jewish volunteers support policing in the area, said they were put up by an orthodox Jewish group during the Torah Procession earlier this week, in order to prevent men and women from the religious sect who are not married or related from touching.” Heather Saul reporting in the Guardian.
Shaikh AbdulQadir – Vote Yes!
Times have moved on since the murabitun squat in Warwick Avenue, the old days of RootJihad and the traumatic moment when the Norwich community disbanded and the illumaniti went on their separate paths. But the Shaikh today retains his sharp and subversive insights: Now that Parliament has been shattered into two fragments, the Commons now committee controlled and the House of Lords, an upper house voided of its function as a senatorial land-owning caretaker of the common folks’ rulings and now merely an extended reward-granted second Commons. The monarchy itself has lost its few remaining powers, its last monarch who fought to preserve a role as final arbiter in the system being George V. George VI and Elizabeth were simply swept aside as the House of Lords and the Royal Prerogative were abolished. At this stage, with Parliament now as voided of power as it had rendered the Monarchy, Scotland is asked if it wants to cede from the Parliamentary Union. All Scottish Muslims in reason must vote YES to be free of English rule. Historically no other position is either honourable or rational. The Shaikh no longer lives in Britain and originally from Ayr, he may well have cast a postal vote.
Yusuf Islam: Finding the Middle Way
The great troubadour has journeyed a long way: from the swinging ’60s to the life-threatening illness in the 70’s which served as a pathway to some serious self-questioning; finding light in Jerusalem and formally embracing Islam in London in 1977…then came his pioneering work setting up an Islamic school in Kilburn, and shortly he was again placed on the pedestal, this time by a new Muslim audience; it was his stricter-than-strict phase and not a particularly happy one, but his talent was irrepressible and shone through in Muslim children’s songs produced by his ‘Mountain of Light’ project. The slog of committee work and collective decision-making did not settle well with him, though his contribution to Muslim Aid, in the settlement of Bosnian refugees, helping Palestinian charities and the launch of the MCB should be on record. It was perhaps these associations that led the US Home Security to place him on a no-flight list, so that in 2004 he was escorted off his flight to Washington and interrogated! Anway, what is past is past. Earlier this year a ceremony in New York saw him join the greats in New York’s Rock and Roll Hall of Fame. He now notes,
The evolvement of the science of Fiqh [Islamic jurisprudence] is a fascinating subject, but it is also not a closed subject. What is halal and what is haram have been stated clearly by Allah and His Prophet (peace be upon him) in the Quran and Sunnah [the sayings of the Prophet Mohammed]. But where there are grey areas, there are allowances for different opinions…
Better late than never in appreciating that Islam is the Middle Way.
What’s in a name!
For some time now, George W Bush’s ‘War on Terror’ has been dropped by the US Department of Defense – it is the ‘US Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO)’. One vacuous term replaced by another. This is a common wheeze to deflect opprobrium and public disgust. The private mercenary firm Blackwater changed its name to the bizarre Xe, to shake of hostile publicity and reputational damage after its employees killed civilians in Iraq. It rebranded again – Academi.<p>At a much minor level, our own HMG decided to rename Windscale as Seascale, because Windscale became associated in the public mind with radiation leaks and other accidents at the eponymous nuclear plant in Cumbria.
Neo-Con think tank continues to avoid scrutiny
The Henry Jackson Society has irked Lady Flynn Forester de Rothschild. She is sueing HJS for breach of trust over the recent ‘Inclusive Capitalism’ event in London, addressed by Prince Charles and Christine Lagarde. The Lady says that the idea and VVIP contacts was hers, and she only outsourced the logistics to HJS, but its director, Alan Mendoza, is now holding back surplus funds due to her from the conference. As a result the Lady has engaged the solicitors Stewarts Law to pursue a £187,000 High Court claim. It is clearly not a matter of money, but rather righting a perceived misdemeanour. One wonders why she did not undertake a due diligence exercise in the first place? There were enough alarm bells to be picked up!
Some years ago, a former employee, Mr M Hoare, went public on Alan Mendoza’s regime: ‘There is absolutely no internal democracy in the HJS, nor any transparency or rules of procedure […] the organisation operates on the basis of cronyism and intrigue. Sole power is held by one individual – Executive Director Alan Mendoza. He was not elected to the post and is not subject even to formal or technical restraints, nor to performance review and renewal of contract. […] The people who replaced the HJS founders at the head of the organisation were staff members of another think-tank: the Israel-advocacy organisation ‘Just Journalism’, of which Mendoza was a member of the Advisory Board and which shared the HJS’s London office.[…] Two other members of Just Journalism’s Advisory Board (who) joined the HJS’s senior staff: Robin Shepherd as ‘Director of International Affairs’ and Douglas Murray as ‘Associate Director’. Thus, four of the six top posts in the HJS are now held by former managers of Just Journalism. They have ensured that the HJS’s political goals have departed radically to those with which it was founded.’
The Henry Jackson Society incorporates the Centre for Social Cohesion and has had Michael Gove as a trustee. The CSC, for example, was exposed in the 2011 Spinwatch report. The outfit, under Murray, published reports such as Hate on the State: How British Libraries Encourage Extremism, Virtual Caliphate and A Degree of Influence – all attempts to demonise British Muslims. HJS is a registered charity – number 1140489. Are not registered charities required to be of public benefit? It beggars belief to understand how it remains a registered charity escaping scutiny of the regulatory authorities. Earlier action by an even-handed Charity Commissioner could have alerted Lady de Rothschild that there was more than meets the eye in an extremist neo-conservative group banally presenting itself as just another ‘cross-partisan, British-based think-tank’. More sanitation tank than think tank.
Who said this?
Living in Britain kills me. Everything is so safe, so sanitized and regulated, life here feels like being shut into a tiny box
Not some problematic young Muslim male – but rather Aris Roussinos – author of the recently published My Life Behind Enemy Lines with warlords, fanatics, and not so friendly fire
Scoffing David Goodhart
So Demos went ahead and held its seminar dealing with Muslim statistics bang in the middle of the Friday congregational prayer! A fly on the wall notes that the introductory remarks were by David ‘there is no racism anymore’ Goodhart. In self-congratulatory vein, he scoffed, “Look, there are Muslims present”. Zamila Bunglawala, one of those referred to, pulled him up short: Friday prayers were obligatory for Muslim men but not for women. Goodhart rolled his eyes. One more black mark in his book! This is the man who made the awful remark about Ken Livingstone’s diversity-friendly tenure as Mayor of London: that it was a balkanisation of the city. The allusion of course being to white flight – and ethnic cleansing – because of the Muslim virus.
Shame on Demos!
One would have imagined that a well-informed think tank holding a seminar on an issue of great importance to Muslims in Britain would welcome their participation. However note this invitation that has recently gone out from Demos:
As you may be aware, Demos is conducting research into the barriers young Muslims face in progressing into higher level professions / careers. The research is part of our Mapping Integration research strand, which is chaired by Trevor Phillips former Chair of the Equality and Human Rights Commission. Research shows that educational attainment rates have dramatically improved in recent years, with young British Muslims showing equal – if not higher – educational attainment than White British pupils. However, data suggests that British Muslims are still under represented in ‘upper professions’ such as finance, banking, media and politics…As part of our research, we are convening a roundtable (with lunch) of experts and stakeholders on Friday 27th June from12.30 – 14.30. …We believe that the research would benefit greatly from your experience and expertise and we very much hope that you will be able to attend.
Are the organisers so unaware (or so indifferent to Muslim practices) that they would time their programme bang in the middle of the weekly jum’a congregational prayer? Must the event be held in Ramadan? Clearly the message must be: Muslims not welcome! Shame.
I love my dog!
Salaam Blogger has been here for half a century but there are aspects of British Values which still baffle him. Apparently – as a mark of affection and friendship – Lady Carla Powell (wife of PR guru Lord Charles Powell, who has served as Tony Blair’s unofficial envoy, and sister in law of Jonathan Powell, TB’s chief of staff) – named one of her dogs, an alsation, “Tony Blair”. No Comment. But it brings to mind Cat Stevens’ first so-Sixties big hit (while blogger was doing his ‘O’ levels):
I love my dog as much as I love you
But you may fade, my dog will always come through.
All he asks from me is the food to give him strength
All he ever needs is love and that he knows he’ll get
So, I love my dog as much as I love you
But you may fade, my dog will always come through.
All the pay I need comes shining through his eyes
I don’t need no cold water to make me realize that
I love my dog as much as I love you
But you may fade, my dog will always come through.
Na, na, na, na, na, na, nana…
But in Lady Carla’s case, Beware my Dog!
Remembering Faiz Ahmed Faiz
These verses from Faiz’s great poem against oppression came to Salaam Blogger’s mind when learning of an event organised by the London Business School recently. The chief guest was the Saudi prince Turki al-Faisal. Among his pearls of wisdom were: “Alhamdu liilah Sisi has won….we will crush the Muslim Brotherhood…Saudi Arabia has allocated $40 billion to tackle terrorism…”. These were totally inappropriate and out-of-place remarks, given the audience. The same gaucherie was exhibited by a gung-ho King Abdullah II of Jordan when invited to a luncheon by the Lord Mayor of London in December 2012 – half of the speech was devoted to demonising the Muslim Brotherhood and calling for Al-Azhar to retain its independence and not be taken under the wing of the new government. No one had a clue what he meant by Al-Azhar. These royal scions are on a clumsy quest for support abroad, because the people are not with them.
Hum Dekhain Gay
We shall see
Lazim Hai ke hum Bhi Dekhain Gay
certainly we, too, will see/ We shall see
Woh Din ke Jis ka Wadah Hai
that day that has been promised us
Jo Loh-e-Azl pe Likha hai
Which is written with God’s ink
Hum Dekhain Gay
We shall see
Jab Zulm-o-Sitam ke Koh-e-garaan
When the mountains of cruelty and torture
Ruii ki Tarah Urd Jain Gay
Will fly like pieces of cotton
Hum Mehkumoon ke Paun Talay
Under the feet of the governed
Yeh Dharti Dhard Dhard Dhardkay gi
this earth shiver, shake and beat
Aur Ehl-e-Hukum ke Sar Uper
And over the head of the ruler
Jab Bijli kard Kard Kardke gi
When lightening will thunder
Hum Dekhain Gay
We shall see
Jab Arz-e-Khuda ke kabay se
When from this God’s earth’s (Kaa’ba)
Sab but Uthwaaiy Jain gay
All the idols will be removed
Hum Ehl-e-Safa Mardood-e-Haram
Then we, of clean hearts–condemned by
zealots those keepers of faith
Masnad pe Bithaaiy jain gay
We, will be invited to that altar to sit and Govern
Sab Taaj Uchalay jain gay
When crowns will be thrown off
Sab Takht Giraaiy Jain gay
and over turned will be thrones
Bas Naam rahay Ga Allah ka
Then only God’s name will remain
[Above extract sourced from http://qausain.wordpress.com/2009/08/06/hum-dekhain-gey/]
Surprising players in Britain’s Islamic Finance Market
Prime Minister David Cameron, speaking at the World Islamic Economic Forum in London in October 2013 seemed quite gung-ho: “…our ambition is to go further still. Because I don’t just want London to be a great capital of Islamic finance in the Western world.I want London to stand alongside Dubai and Kuala Lumpur as one of the great capitals of Islamic finance anywhere in the world”. The market opportunities have been picked up in unexpected quarters, including UK Israel Tech Hub, an enterprise founded by the British Embassy in Tel Aviv in order “to create partnerships in which British companies help Israeli innovation go global, and Israeli innovation gives British companies a global competitive edge”. An event in London on 19th June (2014), sponsored by the corporate law firm Wragge Lawrence Graham has three logos on its publicity flyer: UK Israel Tech Hub, HMG’s UK Trade & Investment and the ‘NewFinance’ network. And the event? ‘Innovations Islamic FinTech, roundtable discussion’. The invitation notes, “the UK is well established as a global player in the Islamic Finance industry…the purpose of this event is to bring together the growing number of interested parties in Islamic FinTech for an exploratory discussion to examine the application of technological innovation to Islamic financial services”. All this begs many questions: is not the technical expertise to be found where Islamic finance is well established, for example enterprises like LembaagaTabung Haji of Malaysia, that has been developing IT systems for Islamic finance for over forty years? Is Israel, a state that denies its Muslim citizens equal rights, a legitimate partner for a discussion to fulfill needs of the Muslim market? Why is HMG promoting Israeli interests, a country in violation of UN resolutions? Is UK Israel Tech Hub’s interest not at odds with the stand taken by anti-Shariah corporate lawyers in the US with Israeli and neo-con connections such as David Yerushalmi?
Bahrain: a betrayal of Christian Liberation Theology?
Bahrain is ruled by a despotic dynasty that is paying out attractive sums of dosh to British and US PR firms to bolster up its image. According to Bahrain Watch these include Bell Pottinger, G3 (Good Goverance Group) and Olton (“leaders in corporate intelligence…that go the extra mile”). Now apparently, Bahrain’s Information Ministry is trying to gain influence in British Muslim civil society (Salaam Blogger has witnessed this first hand – there is no dearth of rentier publicists). It seems the 21st Century despots have gained a new sophistication and skills in camouflaging violence. They are also willing “to go walking on the cat walk” – to use Professor John Keane’s description of the despots. A pity therefore that Church in Need, a Catholic charity, has succumbed to the charm offensive. Impressed that King Isa Al Khalifah has donated land in Awali, south of Manama City, for a cathedral, Bishop Camillo Ballin has thanked Bahrain’s king and ruling family “for their magnanimous gesture of goodwill to the Catholic community of Bahrain in granting 9,000 square meters of land” that will also serve as the vicariate’s apostolic headquarters. What has happened to Christian liberation theology? It was about providing succour to the oppressed rather than solidarity with the oppressor. Remember the words of Gustavo Guterez, its founding figure, in his powerful essay, ‘Notes for a theology of liberation': “What ultimately brings Christians to participate in liberating oppressed people is the conviction that the gospel message is radically incompatible with an unjust, alienated society.They see clearly that they cannot be authentic Christians unless they act”. Is not Bahrain today an unjust, alienated society, whatever the PR charm offensive?
Ex-MP Andrew Dismore and the Londonistan narrative
Some years ago, Mr Dismore, former MP for Hendon and now London Assembly member for Barnet and Camden, was among the vociferous voices highlighting the ‘threat’ posed by Abu Hamza. For example, in 2004, he called for Abu Hamza to be “thrown out” of the UK”, asking why “the British people” were tolerating this man “despite his anti-Semitism, holocaust denial and hatred for our country and our society, from Her Majesty the Queen downwards”. Well, now we know, but alas a decade later when the damage to community relations has been done and the British public have become deeply suspicious of Muslims. The reason why Abu Hamza’s activities were not curtailed, according to a report by Philip Sherwell in the Telegraph: “Holding up what he said were reports from Scotland Yard, Joshua Dratel [Abu Hamza’s lawyer in the US trial taking place in May 2014] described the cleric as an ‘intermediary’ who cooperated with MI5 and the police to try to end foreign hostage-takings and defuse tensions with the Muslim community in Britain….Mr Dratel cited specific cases in which he said that the British authorities turned to Hamza for his assistance. After arrests were made in Britain related to the civil war in Algeria, Hamza was asked ‘how the community is reacting and how to keep the community in equilibrium”, he said. “He agreed to do so and made proposals.’ On another occasion, when a British captive was taken in Kashmir, Hamza was reportedly asked to try to intervene as he had connections with the hostage-taking group from his time in Afghanistan in the 1980s. Mr Dratel said his client made “some phone calls” but was unable to help. And the lawyer said that after two suspects in the 1998 US embassy bombings in east Africa were subsequently arrested in Britain, there was a discussion between Hamza and the authorities about ‘cooling the hotheads’.”
So Abu Hamza was a manufactured hothead and a honeytrap. Will Mr Dismore now acknowledge he was rather too eager to pass judgement and is sorry for his role in framing the Londonistan narrative? Telegraph, 7 May 2014
A note for Mr Shawcross
William Shawcross landed the job as Chair of the Charity Commissioners having served on the board of the Henry Jackson Society. It helps to be friends of Michael Gove, a fellow trustee of HJS, an institution that purports to be a think tank but arguably a home from home for Likudniks and holders of a Manichean world view (that ‘Islam is Darkness’) . He now has Muslim charities in the crosshairs. Woe betide them if they send money to groups in Syria! According to him “Islamic extremism is the most deadly threat to charities”. Sounds like hyperbole – the sort of talk one hears from security chiefs seeking to increase their budgets. Don’t expect Shawcross to investigate British registered charities connected to Israeli settler activity in the occupied territories of Palestine. Don’t expect him to finger the many front organisations in the UK that support Hindu fanaticism and have served as a conduit to Modi’s party machinery in the guise of relief funds (as suggested by the fearless Priyamvada Gopal).Oh No!
Perhaps Shawcross was brought to the CC to ensure good governance. We hope the organisation keeps a register of conflicts of interest. Shawcross is partisan – once described as “politically somewhat to the right of Lord Voldemor”. According to the Greater Surbiton blogger he has described Guantanamo Bay as representing ‘model justice’ and as being ‘probably the best-run detention centre in the world and with more habeas corpus rights for detainees than anywhere else’; claimed that ‘Rupert Murdoch has been the bravest and most radical media owner in Britain in the last 40 years’, whose ‘real crime is to have challenged liberal conventions in the US and here.’ Believe that!
Charles Farr’s no-show
Representatives of Muslim charities and other groups were looking forward to meeting the Home Office supremo at the Office for Security & Counter-Terrorism (OSCT) on March 21 at the Baker Street mosque. The organiser was the Muslim Council of Britain and the aim was to seek some explanation from Mr Farr for his frequent briefings to the media about the ‘extremist’ dangers posed by Syrian returnees, rather than raising the matter with Muslim bodies directly. Attendees were disappointed: he did not turn up, but was represented by Sir Peter Fahy, Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police and the PREVENT spokesperson. According to one fly on the wall, Fahy had one message: MUSLIMS, DON’T GO TO SYRIA.How disciplinarian! Those present responded robustly – why is it no concerns are raised when ‘White ethnicity’ doctors and surgeons respond to the humanitarian crisis, but are for ‘people of colour’! Why is it that registered Muslim charities are being viewed with suspicion rather than non-Muslim ones? How come the PM was ready to send in British troops but now criminalising others wishing to go and help? Why are passports being confiscated from aid workers who are Muslim? Finally, a domestic blowback is less likely, because most Muslims accept that the mess has less to do with Western machinations and more with the Saudi vs Iran regional power games. Apparently Mr Farr has scheduled another meeting – watch this space.
Lord Curzon’s Ghosts
Lord Curzon was an imperialist of the old school, who did not think much of the freedom struggle in India, once dismissing the peoples of India for feebleness because they did not indulge in contact sports (like rugger) and dismissing Bengalis as a chattering class of “babus” – during his years of Viceroy of India (1899-1905) he presumably never encountered either kabbadi or Tagore! So like the HMG-philes of Quilliam Foundation appropriating the name of Abdullah Quilliam, so a body called Curzon Education Ltd seems to believe that a quintessential imperialist nabob’s moniker might add a touch of class! Director of CE is retired captain Afzal Amin, also Tory candidate for Dudley North – a Labour marginal – which can turn blue if a 1000 of the constituency’s 5000 Muslims decide to back him. He was recently spotted at Woking Mosque’s WWI commemorations, hobnobbing with Brigadier Mark Abraham, Chief of Staff Headquarters Support Command. But why CE at Woking? Because this company is associated with the Curzon Institute, which apparently has a grant from CLG for talking about the contribution of Commonwealth soldiers in WW1 in British schools. The brief seems to have been extended to include venues like mosques – where Hugo Clarke of the Institue delivered a talk on 4 February.
À la QF, such talks were going to include a counter-terrorism agenda, but thanks to a scoop from Ahmed Versi, editor of The Muslim News, this was scuppered when he declared, “In its latest misguided policy, the British Government is planning to send Muslim soldiers into schools to challenge Muslim children about their patriotism rather than address the abuse, attacks and victimisation suffered following the Woolwich murder.” Lady Macbeth at the CLG has apparently shelled out CE with “£120,000 for 50 talks this year at an average of £2,400 each.”
A justified Anger
Even the mild-mannered, distinguished, interfaith champion Lord Indarjit Singh of the British Sikh community is upset by revelations that Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher sanctioned British Army advice to Indira Gandhi for the attack on the Golden Temple in Amritsar in 1984. If Lord Indarjit is upset, what about the others? Note his strong language on Foreign Secretary William Hague’s statement in the Commons (4 Feb 2014) based on a review of documents (some were destroyed) relating to the incident: “smug and condescending”. On the claim that UK advice had a “limited impact” of the Golden Temple attack: “It is like saying that I had only a minimal involvement in a massacre or a holocaust.” He said the language in the documents was “insulting” to Sikhs – suggesting they were all extremists – and the UK’s real motivation in assisting India was keeping its arms contracts. All this is particularly poignant during World War I centenaries – after all 130,000 Sikhs volunteered (and some conscripted) to fight for Empire. Will Indarjit talk of his hurt on his next ‘Thought of the Day’ slot on Radio 4? Tory politicians are rightly worried about the Sikh vote in marginal constituencies – there are 800,000 Sikhs in the UK.
Donkey’s bray, people cringe
The e-mails from the Chairman of Quiliam Foundation, Maajid Nawaz, to senior civil servant Mark Caroll at the Department of Communities & Local Government will long be cited as examples of ingratiation and naivite! In the pursuit of what exactly?
8 October 2013
Due to the nature of this unprecedented news, we have been coordinating this transition [Stephen Yaxley’s apparent defection from the English Defence League] and all costs associated to it
without a budget. Please let us know if you can urgently help us with a direct contribution so that we may fund Stephen’s transition and cut off his previous dependency on EDL donors. Finally, I thank you from the bottom of my heart for your continued support for Quilliam as we make history in this way. Today we hope to make you proud!
11 June 2013
The Prime Minister has indeed been listening to us. Only a week before the Woolwich murder he called upon me to visit him and the Foreign Secretary at Chequers in order to
advise officials on what our governments policy should be towards new Islamist regimes in the Middle-East. However, we believe that much more needs to be done to roll out the Prime Minister’s counter-extremism vision mandated back in 2011…
We at Quilliam believe that the solution lies in the development of grass-roots counter-narrative initiatives, and capacity building within communities. Only by providing civil society with knowledge and tools will we see a decline in the threat of extremism and terrorism in
the UK. In fact, we already have ideas about what such initiatives could look like.
Going for the chops!
The honourable Lord Sheikh of Cornhill has had a bumpy ride in the media recently and he must have spent many a meditative hour at his club, Whites, reflecting on the change from the gentlemanly world of insurance underwriters where he made his mark. It all began when some personal details of his life found their way to the pages of the Mail on Sunday and the Daily Mail – something to do with a young waitress. Then there were bizarre accounts of a once-confidante being chased by the benign Tory peer, now more a fist-shaking ghostbuster, down the hallowed Peers Corridor. None of this must have impressed the dignified Lady Sheikh, who runs her husband’s office with an iron fist clad in a velvet glove. However two recent interventions have gone some way to restoring our shaikh’s credibility – as the most intellectually well-equipped Muslim peer. The first was in the debate to counter Lord Pearson on the issue of Islamophobia. Then on 16 January 2014 Lord Sheikh made an important intervention in a Lords debate on religious slaughter (dhabiha or schehita):
Islam permits the slaughter of animals for food, but dictates that such slaughter must be exercised humanely. There has never been any conclusive scientific evidence to suggest that religious slaughter is less humane than conventional mechanical methods. The controversy revolves primarily around the issue of stunning. Exemption from stunning is allowed for halal and kosher slaughter. In halal slaughter the animal ceases to feel pain due to the immediate brain starvation of blood and oxygen. For the first few seconds after the incision is made, the animal does not feel any pain. This is followed by a few seconds of deep unconsciousness as large quantities of blood are drained from the body. Thereafter, readings indicate no pain at all. It is important to consider that prohibiting halal meat would have profound social and economic implications. There are now 2.7 million Muslims in the United Kingdom, 4.8% of the population. Halal meat accounts for between 10% and 15% of UK meat sales; some of this meat is, however, pre-stunned. People from all religions and backgrounds now choose halal as an alternatively produced meat. I want to see a rigorous code of conduct and an efficient system of self-regulation. This would reassure non-Muslims that such animals are being respected and standards are being adhered to. I would also like a full and transparent system of labelling for all meats, so that the consumer can make an informed decision about the meat they buy. Labelling should not be confined to religiously slaughtered meat. Finally, Islamic leaders have asked the Jewish community for guidance on this, and I hope they can work together.
The fuss on halal meat has arisen for several reasons: at one level it is Islamophobia – one dim wit peer made a link between the cruelty of FGM and dhabiha. For animal welfare lovers, it is the fact that some meat from animals subject to dhabiha (and hence possibly unstunned) is entering the distribution network. Strangely they think that stunning before dhabiha would be more humane – even though stunning involves harsh regimes such as electrocution or shooting a mechanical bolt into the brain. The noble Lord has made a good stand and will shame the Muslim lobby that seeks to make pre-stunning mandatory (e.g. who have accepted lamb from New Zealand which is stunned and then dhabiha). All this information should be leading to more Muslim vegetarians!
Until recently Fiyaz Moghul, CEO of Faith Matters , was quite ardent about the Lib Dems – in fact a Lib Dem councillor (for Noel Park in Haringey) and even a London mayoral aspirant in 2008. He was advisor to Nick Clegg no less, on “interfaith and preventing radicalism and extremism”. However the talk in the street is that he has become upset with this allegiance and is now a Labour Party man! Has Moghul’s disaffection and defection anything to do with the new darling of the Party – the Quilliam Foundation boss, Mr Majid Nawaaz – recently selected Lib Dem PPC for Hampstead & Kilburn? Was there a fallout between these two ‘Preventing Extremism experts’. Did they draw swords when vying for the same pot of shiny lucre? Maybe Fiyaz is returning home, after all he was quite effusive of Labour’s neo-con sympathising CLG minister Hazel Blears – someone with “a strong grasp on her portfolio… I welcome her vision.”
Lady Macbeth’s boo-boo -
Some gossip late in the telling but which remains amusing. Apparently she who bestrides ministries in both the FCO and CLG ruffled a few feathers in No. 10 in August. One of her favoured gatekeepers arranged for the PM to visit a mosque in North Manchester – deemed to be of the ‘non-extremist variety’, on Eid ul Fitr. However when the time came for the Friday khutbah on the day, the imam lashed out in a most florid speech denouncing his bête noire, “the sharabi wahabbis”. When the evidence of this extremism was brought to No. 10’s attention, the reaction was not sanguine!
In the Corridors of Power
“Whitehall’s most secretive mandarin” – a description attributed to Charles Farr, Home Office’s head of the office of security and counter-terrorism. He was asked to front the security organisations’ response to the Intelligence & Security Committee in July 2012 reviewing the draft communications data bill (aka the ‘snoopers’ charter). He did this in true Civil Service ‘economic with the truth’ style, not mentioning the GCHQ Tempora programme, now public knowledge thanks to Snowden. What do we know of this adroit operator? For a start, he was pipped to the post heading up MI6 when Tony Blair backed John Sawers. His enemies put the story that he was “too gung-ho”. At the Home Office he has been very much his own man, prepared to stand up to the superficial Neville-Jones, and later disagreed with Home Secretary May over the Zakir Naik affair. However, he does have history: according to one report, Farr came to prominence ‘flying round Afghanistan in a helicopter with thousands of dollars in bundles, doing deals with farmers to not grow opium. Bad policy as it turned out, but he did it very well’.
Will she, Wont she? Salma Yaqoob did well in the 2010 General Election, even though losing to Labour’s Roger Godsiff in Birmingham Hall Green, she obtained a swing
of 8%. It seems that Godsiff will stand again in 2015, while Salma now no longer has the Respect Party machinery to back her since her entirely justified resignation over George Galloway’s remarks on women. She lacks the sort of opportunistic ambition that will make her join Labour for a safe seat elsewhere? Most likely, so there is now an opportunity for a conscientious and principled woman to take up a leadership role within Muslim civil society.
Salaam Blogger slams a few wide balls to the boundary…
Much ire from Lady Macbeth
Our lady straddling the FCO and the CLG has apparently not taken kindly to the Muslim News’s scoop
Editor Ahmed Versi forthrightly declared, “In its latest misguided policy, the British Government is planning to send Muslim soldiers into schools to challenge Muslim children about their patriotism rather than address the abuse, attacks and victimisation suffered following the Woolwich murder.”
Soon, as is the lady’s want, one of her lackeys was at the other end of the phone to Mr Versi, making all sorts of high-handed claims and questioning the veteran journalist’s sources. Mr Versi rightly pointed out, the need of the hour was for school visits that raised awareness of Islamophobia.
APPG on Islamophobia
The All-Party Parliamentary Group on Islamophobia has had a chequered history. When first mooted, many Muslims hoped it would be named the APPG on Islamophobia and Anti-Semitism, because these are both manifestations of hatred due to religious prejudice and stereotyping. However there was a strong lobby amongst peers associated with the Board of Deputies to block this – in fact their agenda was to ensure that the APPG looked at anti-semitism amongst Muslims! Then they successfully blocked the Muslim civil society group Engage from providing secretarial services on charges of being critical of Israel. Now, according to academic Chris Allen, “This week (16 July 2013), the APPG on Islamophobia will again being relaunched. Hoping for third time lucky, the APPG will launch with a meeting considering events post-Woolwich. Whilst this presents much food for thought, I am slightly concerned by the potential connotations some will conclude by naming the meeting ‘A Tribute to Drummer Lee Rigby: Lessons from Woolwich’….” So now for the great and the good at Westminster efforts to tackle Islamophobia are to be neutered by viewing it within the counter-terrorism security lens!
No. 10’s tame cats
On the Muslim civil society grapevine is the news that a recent visitor for tea at No.10 was the chairman of Quilliam Foundation, the counter-terrorism think tank that “stands for religious freedom, equality, human rights and democracy”. The same gentleman was also in the audience at a recent event when Education Secretary Michael Gove commended Israel’s record ‘on democracy and equal rights for women and Arab Israelis’! Apparently not a contradictory word from the QF chairman. Has no one heard of the discrimination in property laws that only apply to Arab Israelis? Or access to welfare and higher education? In Mr Gove’s book criticism of Israel is extremism – what does QF think? A clear statement is needed from eminent poly wonks at QF.
…Ah yes – the tea at No.10 – that was when our shallow PM said that the gentleman was “his favourite Muslim”. The purring could be heard across the road.
What a travesty that the fiercely independent and pan-Islamist Abdullah Quilliam should have his name associated with an institution devoid of a sense of justice. Education Secretary Gove: Muslims must counter antisemitism
The revelations on Lambert’s infilltration of environmental groups and ‘sleeping with the enemy’ bring to mind another undercover officer – Alexander Wilson – see the brilliant biography by Tim Crook.
Salaam Blogger in his time has attended a few meetings convened to discuss ‘violent extremism’ post 7/7. The well-dressed and dignified Robert Lambert was often present, representing the Muslim Contact Unit in Special Branch and later, on his retirement, as director of the European Muslim Research Centre at Exeter University. Did his colleague at EMRC, Jonathan Githens-Mazer (now Professor), know of his colleague’s history of spying during their joint work on Islamophobia? Why were MEMO and the Cordoba Foundation so trusting and so ready to provide him their platform? Was it a two-way street? Let us hope so!
What about Alexander Wilson? Well, he was inflitrated into Islamia College, Lahore in the mid-1920s and employed by a trusting Abdullah Yusuf Ali!
Saatchi’s ‘playful tiff’!
So domestic violence can be construed as a playful tiff – “About a week ago, we were sitting outside a restaurant having an intense debate about the children, and I held Nigella’s neck repeatedly while attempting to emphasise my point”. Imagine if instead of powerful personalities with a fleet of PR gurus to handle damage limitation it would have been a Mr and Mrs Siddiqui! There would have been an outcry about Islam’s treatment of women and Muslims not appreciating Britain’s values!
Saatchi: ‘Nigella Lawson Caution Was Best’
Well said, Ed Hussain
“When the London riots broke out two summers ago, the United States government did not call for police restraint, despite 3,100 arrests, nor seek to be involved through its ambassador as police harshness became known. We do not lecture our democratic allies — and Turkey, on balance, is a democratic country and a vital ally. We should support the government and, if anything, understand that the stakes are high….” Supporting Erdogan Helps Democracy
Return of the Living Dead
Quilliam calls for a resurrection of Blair’s neo-cons: “…Quilliam believes that the urgency of the challenge ahead necessitates that any such strategy now devised should be directly coordinated by Downing Street itself, and led by an appointed expert on a non-partisan basis. The UK possesses a number of such experts who have previously served in official senior government capacities, and who would be well suited to filling this role, having the maturity and experience to coordinate issues arising from the Prime Minister’s Task Force..”
Quilliam Policy Document
Henry Jackson Society & our Charity Commission boss
The Charity Commission has been one of the blue-ribbon institutions of Britain. Eyes are now on its new chair, William Shawcross. He has close links with the highly opinionated Henry Jackson Society and nest of neo-cons – a member of its Board, no less. Civil society will be watching the CC closely for any politically-charged policies and initiatives. Someone should challenge the HJS’s public interest status!
David Cameron’s positive intervention
Due acknowledgement should be made of the Prime Minister’s comments in the wake of the Woolwich atrocity: “…This was not just an attack on Britain – and on our British way of life. It was also a betrayal of Islam – and of the Muslim communities who are give so much to our country…Terrorism that has taken more Muslim lives than any other religion….” Statement on Woolwich incident
Lord Patel’s politics
The peerage bestowed on Lord Adam Patel in February 2000 was widely seen in the local Blackburn community as a gift from Jack Straw to mark both access to the Gujarati vote bank for Labour and also a long-standing personal friendship – apparently the young Straw spent his honeymoon in Adam Patel’s village in Bharuj, Gujarat?! The noble Lord’s service in Parliament has been low-key, though some of his Parliamentary Questions have been surprising – for example in 2011 “To ask Her Majesty’s Government what steps they plan to take to reduce the vulnerability of global navigation satellite systems to terrorist attacks…”. Lord Adam Patel was also gifted a position in the until-recently FCO sponsored British Hajj Delegation. Now the noble Lord has raised some eyebrows in his local community by endorsing the butcher of Gujarat,Chief Minister Nerendra Modi. According to the Batley journal ‘Paigham’, Patel stated, “as a Gujarati myself, I consider it to be a gross insult that the CM of my state, hower, wronged (sic) one might feel he is, cannot express his views at a global forum because a few (!) in the audience dislike him”. Paigham also reports that “…in January Patel is said to have met Modi during a visit to Gujarat”.
Source: Paigham Publications, Batley, Issue 241, April 2013
Austen Ivereigh, man of principle
Man to watch – Austen, head of the Catholic Voices group, former media officer to Cardinal Murphy O’Connor and lead campaigner at London Citizens for asylum seekers’ dignity. He is now valiantly fighting the corner to ensure the word ‘marriage’ remains what it should be. But was it right of him to vote UKIP as a sign of disgust with the main political parties?
Baroness Warsi was a keynote speaker at the launch of the exhibition ‘Righteous Muslims’ at the Board of Deputies of British Jews in London in April 2013, an event co-organised by Faith Matters. The accompanying booklet by Fiyaz Mogul of Faith Matters has been a long time in the coming – it was first announced in April 2010!
Mr Mogul has several interfaith bridge-building credentials: board member of European Institute for the Study of Contemporary Anti-Semitism (EISCA, chaired by Denis Macshane) and associated with the Community Security Trust through the Islamophobia recording project funded by HMG, Tell Mama. Faith Matters has a remarkably wide range of expertise, having previously published a study, The Tanzimat: Secular Reforms in Ottoman Turkey’. And the Baroness? She apparently made a “frank” speech – hopefully not as cliche ridden as the one to EISCA she delivered in November 2011 – must every politician quote “First they came for the communists…”
Riding High, Riding Low
Let us hope that William Hague is taking steps to unhitch the FCO bandwagon from State Department bunglings…”Karzai has infuriated US officials by accusing Washington of colluding with Taliban insurgents to keep Afghanistan weak…In Baghdad, Kerry confronted the Iraqi prime minister, Nouri al-Maliki, for continuing to grant Iran access to its airspace and said Iraq’s behaviour was raising questions about its reliability as a partner”.
John Kerry makes surprise visit to Afghanistan
The Real Twit?
Official Saudi cleric Abdul-Aziz Al-Sheikh says Twitter “a council for jokesters” while dissident cleric Salman al-Odah has 2.5 million followers!
The Dark Side
Glenn Greenwald brilliantly exposes “a separate justice system for Muslims” in the US – the FBI paid one informant $200,000 to infiltrate a local mosque in Lodi, California. It is known that in the UK our agencies have been giving Somali youth a stark choice – join our payroll or life will become unbearable. Similarly the Prevent strategy has fragmented Muslim civil society by creating overnight wealthy groups and ‘King’s Parties’! Just look out for very sophisticated websites or young men with apartments in Dubai….
Remember the Brtish Army/Special Branch informer Stakeknife in the dirty war in Northern Ireland and also Agent Rupert, US-born David Rupert, paid £700,000 to infiltrate dissident Republican groups (Financial Times, 19 June 2003). The dark side of our liberal democratic dispensation.
Saudi Musical Chairs
With the demise of Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz Al-Saud, Governor of Riyad curiously described by the OIC as “one of the biggest leaders of the Islamic Ummah”, some more shuffling amongst the remaining sons of Abdul Aziz ibn Saud. Room is now being made in the second-tier leadership for his grandsons – the new Governor is Prince Khalid bin Bandar bin Abdulaziz. Tipped as a coming monarch is the former intelligence chief Prince Muqrin bin Abdulaziz – the last of the first generation – currently second deputy prime minister. Incumbent King Abdulllah was born in 1926 – the succession fun and games will come after Mugrin’s departure because then it will be the Abdul Azilz’s grandsons competing for the throne.
Sadiq Khan’s blunder
An analysis of the way Muslim-heritage MPs voted on 5th February 2013 in the successful adoption of the Equal Marriages Bill which allows same-sex civil partnerships to be deemed as marriage:
- Rushanara Ali
- Sadiq Khan
- Shabana Mahmood
- Anas Sarwar
- Sajid Javed
- Rehman Chishti
- Yasmin Qureshi
- Khalid Mahmood
The decision of Sadiq Khan to vote for the Bill – a former chair of MCB Legal Affairs Committee – has prompted derision within community circles! “He could have abstained”, remarked the incandescent head of the Lancashire Council of Mosques
His Master’s Voice
Majed Nawaz of Quilliam: “Cameron has rightly said that efforts to undermine al-Qaida in the Sahel-Saharan region will take decades….”
Voice of Sanity from the Guardian in its editorial, ‘Only Folly lasts for Decades’ (22nd Jan 2013, “Words matter, particularly after the past decade of western intervention in Muslim countries, and particularly when uttered by a British prime minister. After such a history of sustained and repeated failure one would have thought David Cameron would choose his words with care in the aftermath of the attack on the Algerian gas plant.”
Counter-terrorism & Mars
At her trial on the media leaks case to News of the World, Detective Chief Inspector April Casburn offered an insight into the nation’s Counter-Terrorism Centre – “male officers who drank together and played golf together”; she also likened the atmosphere to ‘Life on Mars in the 21st century’. So this is the CTC to whom the State has given such draconian powers.
Hacking: Scotland Yard anti-terrorism officers regarded investigation as ‘bit of a jolly’
Lady Macbeth stalks again!
According to the OIC’s December bulletin – ” United Kingdom’s Senior Minister of State, Foreign and Commonwealth Office, Baroness Saiyda Warsi, sent an invitation letter to the Secretary General of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu to join a core group of influential government ministers and policy makers in London on 22 January 2012 in order to brainstorm on building common ground on combating religious intolerence”.
Why is the SG obliging? Something to do with his next assignment once his term finishes in 2013? And who will be invited by the Baroness to the high-table from the Muslim community?
Our distinguished Parliamentarians!
Mr Sajid Javid, Conservative MP for Bromsgrove & newly appointed Treasury minister. December 2012: Mr Javid, who described himself as a ‘proud British-born Muslim’, announced that if he had to leave Britain to live in the Middle East, then he would choose Israel as home. Only there, he said, would his children feel the ‘warm embrace of freedom and liberty”. For him, only Israel shared the democratic values of the UK.
“My own family’s heritage is Muslim. Myself and my four brothers were brought up to believe in God, but I do not practise any religion. My wife is a practising Christian and the only religion practised in my house is Christianity”.Report by Martin Bright, JC, 13th December 2012; http://alturl.com/fcwaa
Baroness Warsi, Conservative Peer, December 2012:”She thinks her background also plays an important part in international relations, and even refers to herself as ‘the minister for Pakistan’.” Interview with Decca Aitkenhead, The Guardian, 9th Dec 2012
Rehman Chishti, the Conservative Muslim MP for Gillingham, after Baroness Warsi’s remarks on growth of Islamophobia: “I dissociate myself from her comments. I’ve never experienced prejudice.”
Fury as Labour ‘smears’ David Cameron after he attacks multiculturalism
It may be a bent bank, but it is our bent bank?
So HSBC has a “pervasively polluted” culture that lasted for years, allowing it “to move billions around the financial system for Mexican drug lords, terrorists and governments on sanctions lists. HSBC’s Mexican operations moved $7bn into the US operations, for instance, which the Senate was told was tied to drug money”. Remember when BCCI was abruptly closed down for misdemeanours that were peanuts in comparison! Because it was a ‘Muslim’ bank?
How The Guardian buckles?
The hardcopy morning edition of the paper on Monday 10th December 2012 had a leading article in the Financial section with the headline- ‘Eurasian mining firm severs ties with Israeli diamond billionaire’ – a story of shady dealings around Dan Gertler – accused of “making most of his $2.5 billion fortune from looting Congo at the expense of its people”. However the online Guardian seems to have been under pressure.
The story’s headline at 8pm the same day was suddenly circumspect: “ENRC ends Congo mining deal with controversial billionaire Dan Gertler”
How to win friends & influence people!
A recent report on JewishNews1 has the title ‘Muslims want to have more more influence on British foreign policy’, adding, “…despite a six-fold increase in the number of Muslims in Britain over the past 30 years it appears, for now that this sizable community has a limited influence over policy making on the Middle East and on Britain’s relationship with Israel”. The question is: will Her Majesty’s Government now run much needed focus groups to see what are our specific gripes? Muslims want to have more influence on British policy
Sir Iqbal’s sixer
Ex-cricketer Sir Iqbal Sacranie executed a neat cover drive and expelled the bumptuous Montgomerie’s website ConservativeHome to the long grass. The website has published a full apology to Sacranie for falsely alleging that he had been rejected as a possible candidate for membership of the Muslim Leadership Council. Well done Adam Tudor of Carter-Ruck – but who would have briefed ConservativeHome in the first place if not Lady Macbeth?
The Double Speak of Jonathan Sacks
The Chief Rabbi told BBC’s Evan Davis that Iran was the real issue behind the crisis in Gaza – probably characteristic of the twisted analysis that is being offered to William Hague to justify Israel’s bombardment. But when he realised the mike was on, the BBC reports: “Lord Sacks then swiftly adopted a more formal broadcasting manner [sic] and suggested the crisis demanded ‘a continued prayer for peace, not only in Gaza but for the whole region’.
Not for the first time the Chief Rabbi has shown two faces: when a respected leader of the Progressive Jewish community, Rabbi Hugo Gryn died in 1996, Sacks attended the memorial service and made an eloquent address – but this did not go down well with the Orthodox rabbis who regarded it a sign of recognition of Reform Judaism. Sacks then wrote a ‘’confessional letter’ in classical Hebrew to the Beth Din judge, Dayan Chanoch Padwa, ‘expressing his pain at having to honour a man he regarded as a destroyer of the faith’.
For earlier postings of this blog, CLICK HERE