Views of contemporary Muslim thinkers

The ‘British Islam’ project

Extracts from the CoolnessofHind blog Deformation of Islam and the neo-conservative threat to society,

‘. . . In Britain, as well as other states around the world, imperialism has transitioned from colonialism, through the globalised, epistemologically Western human rights discourse, to its third-incarnation of the security, counter-terrorism and counter-extremism paradigm. Using spurious and academically-debunked securitisation discourses, everything, from merely living in area of Muslims to holding orthodox Islamic beliefs, has been brought within the linguistic and literary smears of the hidden subversive threat – a genuine conspiracy theory advocated by the far-right and neoconservatives and now government “tsars” which has been all but stubbornly ignored by dystrophic liberal/Left intelligentsia.

The discrimination against the Muslim minority ranges from the manifestly evident political Islamophobia of the Prevent Strategy *which is a thinly-veiled, structurally Islamophobic propaganda project aimed to socially engineer a compliant, spiritually-eviscerated Muslim, to the “invisible racism” percolating through the discourse of integration, where Muslims are at odds with the “rest of society”, and in the words of Trevor Phillips, forming “a nation within a nation”. The emerging assimilationist “integration” policies aim to further control Islam and the lives of Muslims and their minds, oddly at odds with the liberalism and freedom Muslims are being simultaneously forced to indoctrinate themselves with through the “British values” thought-control project.

Muslims, in other words, are to be “emancipated” from their scriptures in favour of ideas handed to them by the state, whilst contending with the logical conundrum of being an “individual” with choice who is forced mentally and physically to be a part of the communitarian, nationalist “mainstream society”.

 

. . .

The external effort impacts the internal constitution of the Muslim minority.  Whether it is the Russians and Western states courting “Sufi Islam”, or “Salafis” justifying draconian counter-terrorism measures in Britain whilst acquiescing to murderous despots like Sisi; whether it is the “cultural Muslim” whose belief in Islam is non-existent yet still considers him or herself fit to tell people what Islam is; or the pseudo-scholar with dubious qualifications instituting a deformation of Islam under the jurisprudential rubric of urf (custom), maslaha (public benefit) and maqasid (objectives) whilst clandestinely undermining the authority of the Ulama (Islamic scholars) and scholastic tradition; the effort to deconstruct Islam comes from multiple angles and openings, and most fundamentally, employs post-modern deconstructionist philosophies to inculcate uncertainty and chaos into the harmonious, organic Islamic faith.

Muslims must become aware of pseudo-scholars whom advocate elaborate but somewhat perfunct proposals, which seem to be orthodox, but in reality perpetuate deconstructionism in their approach to Islam, often under smokescreen rubric of “contextualising Islam”, or providing a “British flavour Islam”, which invariably involves shunning the visible manifestations of the Sunnah. Islam’s tradition is based on chains of authority (sanad) and licenses (ijaza) and indeed without these traditional, rigorous verificatory devices, it is bound to be corrupted. These sophisticated doors of inquiry should be in the back of the mind of every Muslim who is absorbing sacred knowledge.

The Islamic sensitivity to local contexts is being twisted to force the exchanging – subtle or wholesale – of particulars of Islam for acceptability. Whilst detailed critical inquiry is urged of Islam’s rulings and theory, the same level of scrutiny is not demanded of the endpoint of such spiritually and intellectually fraught attempts to deconstruct Islam. Indeed, the spiritual edifice of this faith spurred and maintained historically unprecedented levels of moral, ethical and political stability for over a millennium all without the all-encompassing surveillance apparatus and attrition of due process and the rule of law emblematic of the modern state.  Those who wish to force the deformation of Islam – the neoconservatives – accept that modernity and its paradigmatically constitutive elements, in particular enlightenment rationalism, has failed to convincingly and coherently produce morality. One does not need to be versed with the works of sociologists and philosophers like Hannah Arendt, Zigmunt Bauman and Foucault to understand the problems: the blind progressivism and narcissistic, amoral individualism coupled with the ethno-nationalisms deceptively garbed in civic nationalisms symbiotically connected to the nation state which violently and/or traumatically, yet “rationally” impose conformity to varying degrees over its minorities, has resulted in a world wrought in chaos, genocides, social disintegration, economic inequality, ecological disaster, and human discontentment.

Changing Islam using bogus post-modern decontructionist theories which render meaning itself meaningless, in favour of the modern paradigm dominated by the Kantian Man or Descartes’s subject, which ultimately produces these catastrophic consequences is indeed a raw, decaying deal.

Whilst the brunt of the culturalist attack is on Islam and Muslims, the impact reverberates across society. There is a need for broader society to realise that the source of the attacks and demonization come from fascist, supremacist neoconservatives, whom are in power.  Bankrupt economic policies for which the public has to pick up the bill and which has seen the inequality gap increase; Machiavellian ideas which breaks down the rule of law and democratic principles consequently denuding the public of their privacy – and rights – against the state, use of perpetual warfare and destabilisation in far off lands to foster fear and the closed society at home; and harnessing state schools, courtesy of militarisation programmes and the “British values” project to create and re-create the subject and therefore a new scholarly elite, producing the necessary cultural domain which validates and reinforces the Straussian neocon state; the neoconservatives constitute the pervasively real – and immediate – threat to society at every level . . .

The above seems like a page ripped out of a dystopian novel, however, the resistance is alive and well. The fact that Muslims are joining hand with their non-Muslim countrymen in defending the rule of law, due process, civil society as well as the poor and needy against the neoconservative onslaught is a fact which drives a stake into the heart of the binary, warring, clash of civilisations thesis. Where neocons see subversive collusions, Muslims view their duty to benefit the community regardless of race or religion, and uphold the principles of justice without compromising their own beliefs and practices. Indeed, it is a peaceful, harmonious – not homogenous – society, that is sought. Where the contrived nationalism of “British values” seeks to create uniformity at the expense of minorities, the above demonstrates the possibility of people belonging together whilst staying attached to their cherished differences.

Despite the political and often physical battering, and seemingly unrelenting waves of aggressive policies, propped by dubious characters afflicting the Muslim minority, it is imperative for Muslims to maintain the Islamic moral centre as, indeed, it is in this state, that hearts find tranquility, spurring activism and an overwhelming urge to continue positively benefit society despite the odds. Like the lifeline thrown to a person drowning at sea in a tempest, in this time of confusion and instability, it is the Qur’an which operates as a stabilising force for Muslims, augmented through the righteous inheritors of sacred knowledge – the Ulama – bequeathed to the Ummah through the noble Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, his impeccable Companions, may Allah be pleased with them, and the self-less men and women whom dedicated their lives to studying Islam with sole aim of pleasing their Lord. It is this rich, perpetually verified tradition and legacy which provides the spiritual and intellectual fortification against the incursions upon the faith of Muslims.’ click here

*link added by Salaam website editor

More from Ideas

Remembering Shariati (1933-77)

Janius Banaji writes on FB:  Looking at him you’d scarcely guess that this suave figure inspired a whole generation of Iranian youth to turn to radical Left politics which included the kind of insurrectionary politics associated then with the Mojahedin-e … read more

Muslims are strange people!

Professor Thomas S. Harrington (professor of Iberian Studies at Trinity College in Hartford, Connecticut) writes in counterpunch.org After the bombing in Manchester and the bridge attack in London, it is more clear than ever: Muslims are very strange people, inherently violent … read more

Is there a ‘Muslim world’?

Asma Afsaruddin, Professor of Islamic studies in the School of Global and International Studies at Indiana University at Bloomington,  reviews Cemil Aydin’s The Idea of the Muslim World: A Global Intellectual History in The Chronicle of Higher Education: . . … read more

More on Balfour

Salman Abu Sitta’s address at the UK’s House of Lords [28 March 2017, from middleeastmonitor.com], ‘We are witnessing today the longest war against a people: A hundred years of the Palestinian people’s struggle for freedom and independence in their own country. … read more

Thoughts on Bosnia

trtworld.com interviews the former Grand Mufti of Bosnia Herzegovina, Mustafa Ceric: 1.  The country is still recovering from the effects of the Bosnian War, a deadly conflict between Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina and those of the Bosnian Serb and Bosnian … read more

The Geopolitics of Culture

Extracts from an essay by Nayef Al-Rodhan, neuroscientist and geo-strategist,  in the Harvard International Review, entitled ‘The Geopolitics of Culture: Five Substrates’. ‘Culture has a salient geopolitical relevance in a world that defines itself by much more than diplomatic exchanges … read more

The Rise & Decline of Pax Americana

In the second part of  ‘The history of Capitalism – a personal view’, Muhammad Nauman Khan explores the emergence of the USA’s “uni-polarity” and the eventual disappointing outcome of the ‘American dream’, adding There is an erosion of US economic and … read more

Deconstructing ‘Radicalisation’

Extracts from an interview with Assistant Professor Nadia Fadil of KU Leuven, Belgium: Radicalisation is a contested notion, due to its exclusive focus on Islam. Yet, radical thinking in itself is not necessarily problematic or undesirable. For example, the early … read more